The Artist as Dissenter- Aicha (Week Two of Presentations)

On Liberty by John Stuart Mill
or how I sum it up
Why You Should Respect Opinion No Matter What

British philosopher, political economist and civil servant.

1. Respect everyone's opinion unconditionally even if you don't agree with them

2. Do not assume that your opinion is always the right one because there were many people who came before you and thought they were right when in fact they were wrong.

3. Do not be perpetually unsure of your opinion. Do not be afraid to voice your opinion, be open-minded. The wisest people in the world are people who came to their opinion after gathering information from both sides of the aisle.

Danger!!!

There is a certain danger in creating an environment which suppresses an opinion. 

                                                Harvey Milk, 1st openly gay mayor of SF

                                                                   MLK

                                                      Ida B.Wells, journalist who wrote about lynchings

                                                       Suffragettes

                                                          Copernicus

Second & Last Piece I will Refer To 

A Transgressive Work and Its Defences 

or as I summarize it 

Why you should respect Art (no matter what)
by Anthony Julius

 

Controversial art shakes things up.

It shatters illusions, exposes prejudice and allows us to see the world in a new light. (Julius)

The job of art is to shock us into some truth. Breaking boundaries should be admired. 

Society exists in two realms, the profane and the sacred. 

There are certain points in time and in history where there is a radical moment that makes everything stop in time. 

Sheppard Fairey Poster of Obama

                                                Banksy graffiti art of cats in Gaza

                                                   The Death of Marat by Jacques-Louis David

Artists as Activists

Artists as Activists

Consider these Questions:

•  What do these three pieces have in common?
•  What do you think they have in mind when they talk about progressive literature, or aligning art with progress?
•  What do each of the authors think about the relationship of art and literature to society?
•  What role do they think the state should play in guiding/directing literature and art?
•  Why does Belinsky feel so betrayed by Gogol?
•  Why, according to Trotsky, does art have to be aligned with its epoch?  What are the implications of that view?
•  What are the implication of Zhdanov’s phrase “an engineer of human souls?”

____________________________________________________________________

** Soviet Union Reign : 1922 -1991 

Vissarion Grigoryevich Belinsky

( 1811 - 1848 )

• Russian literary critic ( mostly during the 1830's - 1840's )

Leon Trotsky

( 1879 - 1940 )

• Founder of the Soviet Red Army and significant leader of Russian Revolution of 1917

Andrei Alexandrovich Zhdanov

( 1896 - 1948 )

• Stalin's successor-in-waiting who lived by his ideological code: the Zhdanov doctrine, which was intended to create a philosophy on artistic validity for the entire world.

____________________________________________________________________

Zdhanov's Speech on Soviet Literature

• language
• power of oral speech and vocal tonation
• "comrades"
• gave a doctrine of "socialist realism", the only acceptable model of writing for Soviet authors/musicians at the time
• suggested an end to freedom of creative experimentation and elimination of nonconforming subject matter

❝ Create works of high attainment, of high ideological and artistic content. Actively help to remold the mentality of people in the spirit of socialism. Be in the front ranks of those who are fighting for a classless socialist society. ❞

• Zhdanovism :  Suggested that the world was divided into the "imperialistic" (USA) and the "democratic (USSR)

 

Trotsky's Literature and Revolution

• Discussions and analyzations of the consciousness of writers during that time, whilst discussing art being a way that the ruling class should ignite as the bourgeoisie
• He suggests that the proletariat's mission in power with art is to fully understand cultural achievements of the past and to then lay a foundation for the cultures in art of the future.

❝ If the Revolution has the right to destroy bridges and art monuments whenever necessary, it will stop still less from laying its hand on any tendency in art which, no matter how great its achievement in form, threatens to disintegrate the revolutionary environment or to arouse the internal forces of the Revolution, that is, the proletariat, communist policy toward art, the peasantry and the intelligentsia, to a hostile opposition to one another. Our standard is, clearly, political, imperative and intolerant. But for this very reason, it must define the limits of its activity clearly. (220) ❞ 

Belinsky's Leetter to Gogol

• Heavily criticized autocracy, serfdom, poverty, prostitution, cruelty to the "less powerful"
• Criticized Gogol's book Selected Passages of Correspondence with Friends (1847) as damaging for eulogizing autocracy, serfdom, and the Orthodox Church and its power

❝ And here the public is right, for it looks upon Russian writers as its only leaders, defenders and saviours against Russian autocracy, orthodoxy, and nationality, and therefore, while always prepared to forgive a writer for a bad book, will never forgive him for a pernicious book. ❞ 

• Completes the message with telling Gogol to quit writing entirely if he continues with the ideals that the book expresses
• States that art is an acceptable expression, except for Gogol's expression
• Feels betrayal to a very high degree

❝ Yes, I loved you with all the passion with which a man, bound by ties of blood to his native country, can love its hope, its honour, its glory, one of the great leaders on its path of consciousness, development and progress. ❞

 ____________________________________________________________________

• Manipulation of language through power; how power seems to play a role in all of their expressions and beliefs.
• Genre; Gogol's book creating an uproar and such a powerful reply versus a speech that gives a positive connotation whilst hiding a darker truth.
• Strictly focused on the relationship between art and politics, as well as the future of a very large society.
• "Freedom of speech", but only if done correctly.
• "Creativity in art", but only if the people approve.
• Limiting artistic creativity.

Welcome to our Blistering Blog